灶具开启状态 + 厨房无人（occupancy=0）持续超过5分钟
厨房温度持续异常上升
最终烟雾报警器触发

立即提醒住户关闭灶具，如无法联系则自动关闭（如支持远程关闭）

The home is currently in a normal state with no detected safety risks or anomalies.

Explanation: Environmental conditions are stable, with all temperature sensors reporting values within a comfortable residential range (22.00°C to 25.58°C) and showing no hazardous spikes, sustained drifts, or impossible transitions.

Explanation: Occupancy patterns indicate a single resident waking in the bedroom at 07:03 and remaining there consistently until the end of the log period, while the living room, kitchen, and bathroom remain unoccupied, aligning with a standard morning routine.

Explanation: The front door lock and contact sensor exhibit a single, standard access cycle at 07:29 (manual unlock, brief open/close, immediate auto-lock) with no evidence of forced entry, jamming, or prolonged insecure states.

Explanation: While telemetry for water leak and smoke/CO alarms is absent from the sampled chunks, this reflects typical data sampling limitations rather than device failure or active hazards; no corroborating unsafe signals (e.g., temperature escalation, alarm triggers, or contact sensor forced open) are present to support an anomaly claim.

Stable temperature readings across bedroom, kitchen, and living room (22-25°C range) with no hazardous escalation.

Consistent bedroom occupancy (raw=1) from 07:03 to 14:30 with all other rooms unoccupied.

Standard 8-second door lock/contact transition at 07:29:14-07:29:22 (unlock -> open -> close -> auto-lock) indicating routine access.

Continue routine monitoring of the current normal occupancy and environmental patterns.

Verify periodic health checks or telemetry configuration for water leak and smoke/CO alarms to ensure complete safety coverage in future data windows.

bathroom bedroom entrance kitchen living_room

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险

kitchen bathroom entrance living_room bedroom

Significant increase in alarmish event frequency from mid-morning through evening

Frequent lock state transitions (4 flips) indicating access activity

Occupancy fluctuations across rooms with periods of unoccupied states

Temperature readings remain within normal residential comfort range

C00 establishes the overnight baseline with low activity and stable temperatures

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险

Normal morning routine with stable environmental conditions and standard access control behavior.

Bedroom occupancy remains consistently 'occupied' (raw=1) from 07:03 through 14:30, indicating a resident is present.

Front door lock/contact sequence at 07:29:14-07:29:22 shows a standard manual unlock, brief door open (contact false), door close (contact true), and immediate auto-lock, consistent with a resident leaving or checking the entry.

Temperature sensors across living room, bedroom, and kitchen remain within a narrow, comfortable residential range (22.00°C to 25.58°C) with no hazardous spikes or sustained drift.

Kitchen and living room occupancy sensors report 'unoccupied' (raw=0), aligning with the single occupant in the bedroom and ruling out active cooking or multi-person activity.

Relies on the assumption that the single visible door cycle represents all access events; the structured signals mention 4 lock flips, but only one is captured in the provided chunks.

Cannot fully verify the operational status of critical safety devices (water leak, smoke/CO) due to their absence in the log timeline.

Potential safety monitoring gap for water/fire hazards due to missing telemetry from critical safety devices.

The provided log chunks (C01-C08) contain zero telemetry, state updates, or event logs for `water_leak_detector` and `smoke_co_alarm`, despite them being explicitly listed as target devices in the query anchor.

While no active fire or leak is currently evidenced (kitchen temps stable, no smoke events triggered), the complete absence of these logs prevents a definitive composite-safety verification and leaves a blind spot for silent hazards.

Absence of logs does not inherently confirm device failure or an active hazard; it may simply reflect a sampling window limitation or device sleep mode.

No corroborating hazard signals (e.g., temperature escalation, contact sensor forced open, or system mode changes) are present to support an active emergency.

Unverified door access pattern and incomplete lock state history.

At 07:29, the front door was manually unlocked, opened, and immediately auto-locked while the bedroom occupant remained inside. Without full historical context, it is unclear if this was a routine exit or an unauthorized entry that triggered the auto-lock.

The structured signals indicate 4 lock state flips, but the provided chunks only capture one transition sequence, leaving the other 3 flips unanalyzed and potentially masking repeated access attempts or system retries.

The contact sensor transitioned normally (false to true) and the lock state successfully recovered to 'locked' (raw=1), showing no signs of forced entry, jamming, or persistent insecure state.

The rapid auto-lock sequence is typical of modern smart locks and does not inherently indicate a breach without evidence of failed attempts or prolonged open states.

Front door lock/contact sequence at 07:29:14-07:29:22 (Manual unlock -> contact false -> contact true -> auto-lock).

Consistent bedroom occupancy (raw=1) from 07:03 to 14:30 vs. unoccupied living room/kitchen/bathroom.

Stable temperature readings across all sensors (22-25°C range) with no hazardous escalation.

Complete absence of `water_leak_detector` and `smoke_co_alarm` logs in the provided timeline.

Discrepancy between structured signal lock_state_flips (4) and visible chunks (1 sequence).

Continuous logs for `water_leak_detector` and `smoke_co_alarm` to verify operational status and rule out silent hazards.

Full historical context for the front door lock/contact events (prior to 07:29 and after 08:25) to establish a baseline for normal access and account for the remaining 3 lock flips.

Logs for kitchen activity devices (e.g., stove, range hood, water valve) to definitively rule out unattended cooking or plumbing faults.

Additional occupancy or motion sensor data for the entrance/living room to correlate with the door access event and verify resident movement patterns.

Retrieve continuous telemetry for water_leak_detector and smoke_co_alarm to verify operational status and rule out silent hazards.

Obtain full historical context for front_door_lock to analyze all 4 state flips and correlate with occupancy/contact sensors.

Check for explicit fault/alarm events or device offline indicators in the complete log set.

Investigator correctly interprets Matter-scaled temperatures and appropriately flags the critical gap in safety device telemetry.

The provided chunks (C01-C08) do not match the triage's focus on C00, C03, C12, C16; please provide these chunks or clarify data availability.

The safety conclusion currently rests mainly on missing telemetry gaps, which carries a high false-alarm risk as it may reflect sampling limitations rather than actual device failure or hazards.

Request the missing chunks and explicit safety device logs to complete the composite-safety assessment before finalizing a verdict.

Routine cooking activity with a minor, quickly resolved smoke event. The cook surface was activated for normal meal preparation, causing a localized temperature spike near the sensor. The smoke alarm likely triggered due to cooking fumes, steam, or minor smoke, but the event was brief and self-resolved as temperatures normalized shortly after.

C00 shows kitchen_cook_surface turned on at 01:11, followed by a temperature rise to 35.00 C.

C00 shows kitchen_smoke_alarm triggering at 01:26, but temperatures immediately drop back to baseline (~23 C) afterward.

No persistent fault codes or repeated alarm events are logged, indicating a single transient incident.

Fails to account for the 15-minute unattended window between appliance activation and alarm trigger.

Does not explain the explicit SmokeAlarm() event without assuming a false positive, which is less likely given the concurrent temperature spike.

Unattended cooking leading to a fire risk / minor smoke event. The kitchen cook surface was left active for approximately 15 minutes without supervision, causing significant heat buildup (35.00 C) and triggering the smoke alarm. The lack of kitchen occupancy logs during this period, combined with unoccupied adjacent rooms, suggests the occupant left the hazard area.

C00: kitchen_cook_surface | OnOff = on at 01:11:00.

C00: kitchen_temp_sensor spikes to 30.57 C (01:16) and 35.00 C (01:21), indicating rapid heat accumulation.

C00: kitchen_smoke_alarm | Event: SmokeAlarm() at 01:26:00, confirming hazardous escalation.

C00: No kitchen occupancy logs during the 01:11-01:26 window, while living_room, bedroom, and bathroom remain unoccupied, supporting a missing supervision context.

Lacks explicit kitchen occupancy logs to definitively prove the occupant left the room (could be a sensor blind spot).

The smoke alarm firing indicates the safety system successfully mitigated the hazard, and the appliance was likely turned off or the event contained, preventing a full fire.

The 15-minute interval in C00 between kitchen_cook_surface activation (01:11) and the smoke alarm trigger (01:26), coupled with the temperature spike to 35.00 C and absence of concurrent kitchen occupancy logs.

Kitchen occupancy sensor logs to verify supervision status during the 01:11-01:26 window.

Details on whether the cook surface has an auto-shutoff feature or if it was manually turned off after the alarm.

Water leak detector status and logs to rule out concurrent plumbing hazards.

Lock state transition details to rule out intrusion or unauthorized access as a cause for the unattended appliance.

door_lock state transitions and access history

comprehensive coverage of all target devices across the full timeline

Investigation is overly narrow, focusing almost exclusively on a single cooking event in C00 while ignoring the comprehensive scope of the query.

False-alarm risk is high because the unattended cooking/fire risk hypothesis relies mainly on missing kitchen occupancy logs and a transient temperature spike that quickly normalized without sustained hazardous escalation.

Key target devices (water_leak_detector, door_lock, contact_sensor) are completely unanalyzed, violating the 'comprehensive safety status' requirement.

Request full log coverage or specific chunks containing the missing device logs to complete the composite-safety assessment and rule out other hazards.

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Layout
Layout: 一室一厅 (Studio/1BR)
- bathroom: 卫生间漏水传感器<water_leak_detector>, 卫生间灯<onoff_light>, 卫生间运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- bedroom: 卧室温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 卧室灯<dimmable_light>, 卧室窗帘<window_covering>, 卧室窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 卧室运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- entrance: 入户门传感器<contact_sensor>, 入户门锁<door_lock>, 玄关灯<onoff_light>
- kitchen: 厨房温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 厨房灯<onoff_light>, 厨房灶具<cook_surface>, 厨房烟雾报警器<smoke_co_alarm>, 厨房窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 洗碗机<dishwasher>
- living_room: 客厅主灯<dimmable_light>, 客厅台灯<onoff_light>, 客厅温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 客厅空调<air_conditioner>, 客厅窗帘<window_covering>, 客厅窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 客厅运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>

## Deterministic Signals
{
  "room_activity": {
    "living_room": 403,
    "bedroom": 508,
    "kitchen": 304,
    "bathroom": 55,
    "entrance": 14
  },
  "attribute_frequency": {
    "MeasuredValue": 868,
    "Occupancy": 376,
    "OnOff": 19,
    "StateValue": 5,
    "LockState": 4,
    "CurrentPositionLiftPercent100ths": 2,
    "SmokeState": 1,
    "ExpressedState": 1,
    "SystemMode": 1,
    "OperationalState": 1,
    "CurrentLevel": 1
  },
  "lock_state_flips": 4,
  "occupancy_events": 376,
  "temperature_patterns": [],
  "value_format_hints": {
    "temperature": "MeasuredValue is shown as Celsius with the raw integer preserved in parentheses.",
    "occupancy": "0=unoccupied, 1=occupied",
    "lock_state": "enumerated lock state rendered as label + raw code"
  }
}

## Chunk Index
[
  {
    "chunk_id": "C00",
    "start_ts": "2026-06-02T00:00:00",
    "end_ts": "2026-06-02T01:40:00",
    "event_count": 80,
    "rooms": {
      "living_room": 26,
      "bedroom": 24,
      "kitchen": 26,
      "bath

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Triage
{
  "primary_task_profile": "composite-safety",
  "secondary_task_profile": "none",
  "query_anchor": {
    "target_rooms": [
      "bathroom",
      "bedroom",
      "entrance",
      "kitchen",
      "living_room"
    ],
    "target_devices": [
      "water_leak_detector",
      "smoke_co_alarm",
      "door_lock",
      "occupancy_sensor",
      "temperature_sensor",
      "contact_sensor"
    ],
    "target_question": "判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险"
  },
  "focus_rooms": [
    "kitchen",
    "bathroom",
    "entrance",
    "living_room",
    "bedroom"
  ],
  "focus_devices": [
    "smoke_co_alarm",
    "water_leak_detector",
    "door_lock",
    "occupancy_sensor",
    "temperature_sensor"
  ],
  "focus_chunk_ids": [
    "C00",
    "C03",
    "C12",
    "C16"
  ],
  "suspected_patterns": [
    "Significant increase in alarmish event frequency from mid-morning through evening",
    "Frequent lock state transitions (4 flips) indicating access activity",
    "Occupancy fluctuations across rooms with periods of unoccupied states",
    "Temperature readings remain within normal residential comfort range"
  ],
  "why_these_chunks": [
    "C00 establishes the overnight baseline with low activity and stable temperatures",
    "C03 captures the onset of rising alarmish counts and occupancy shifts, marking a potential trigger point",
    "C12 represents the peak event frequency and activity during evening hours to assess hazard context",
    "C16 shows the final log segment to determine if the elevated activity resolves or persists before cutoff"
  ],
  "latent_task_profile": "composite-safety",
  "query_intent_profile": "composite-safety"
}

## Investigato


温度异常上升但无合理热源（空调关闭/制冷模式，灶具关闭） 上升速度超过正常烹饪或日照导致的范围

火灾风险警报，建议住户检查该区域电器

The home is operating normally with stable environmental conditions and appropriate hazard mitigation during the evening routine.

Explanation: Temperature readings across all monitored rooms remain within a comfortable and stable range (22.5-25.4 C) throughout the observed timeline, with no signs of overheating or environmental hazards.

Explanation: Occupancy patterns align with a normal daily routine, showing expected presence in the living room, master bedroom, and entrance during evening hours without erratic or unattended activity in high-risk zones.

Explanation: The kitchen cook surface was properly turned off at 19:29:00, followed by the kitchen window closing at 19:29:30, demonstrating correct hazard mitigation and routine completion.

Explanation: The transient `None` value from the kitchen temperature sensor at 19:30:00 immediately recovered to a valid reading, consistent with a minor network glitch rather than a device fault or safety risk.

Explanation: No smoke, CO, or water leak alarms were triggered, and the overall telemetry supports a safe, uneventful evening and night period.

kitchen_cook_surface turned off at 19:29:00 and kitchen_window_contact closed at 19:29:30

Stable temperature ranges (22.5-25.4 C) and consistent occupancy transitions across all rooms

Immediate recovery of kitchen_temp_sensor to 22.83 C after a single transient `None` reading

No immediate action required; continue routine monitoring.

Maintain current smart home automation rules for cooking and ventilation.

enumerated lock state rendered as label + raw code

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险

Normal evening routine with completed cooking and stable environmental conditions.

Cook surface turned off at 19:29:00, followed by kitchen window closing at 19:29:30, indicating active hazard mitigation and routine winding down.

Temperatures across all monitored rooms remain stable and within comfortable ranges (22.5-23.0 C) during evening and night periods, with no sustained heat growth.

Occupancy patterns show expected presence in living room and master bedroom during evening hours, with no erratic or prolonged unattended activity in high-risk zones.

No smoke, CO, or water leak alarms triggered throughout the monitored timeline.

Relies on the assumption that turning off the cook surface and closing the window fully mitigates any residual cooking risks, though no corroborating hazard escalation is observed in the logs.

Isolated kitchen temperature sensor telemetry dropout during evening transition.

At 19:30:00, `kitchen_temp_sensor` reports `TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue = None`.

The reading immediately recovers to 22.83 C in the same timestamp block, with no subsequent drops or stuck values.

Single isolated event with immediate recovery does not meet the threshold for persistent sensor malfunction or safety device failure.

Likely a transient network glitch, batch log formatting artifact, or routine sensor polling gap rather than a hardware fault or safety risk.

Cook surface off (19:29:00) and window closed (19:29:30) confirm active hazard mitigation and normal routine completion.

Kitchen temp sensor `None` at 19:30:00 followed by immediate valid reading indicates transient telemetry issue, not sustained failure.

Stable temperature ranges (22.5-25.4 C) and consistent occupancy transitions rule out fire risk or environmental hazards.

Detailed lock state logs (raw codes/labels and timestamps) to verify the 5 lock state flips are normal entry/exit or auto-lock events.

Continuous smoke/CO alarm and water leak detector status logs to fully confirm absence of environmental hazards.

Context for the 5 lock state flips (e.g., manual vs. auto, time distribution) to rule out tailgating or credential testing.

Lock state logs and smoke/CO/water leak detector logs are completely absent from the provided chunks. While correctly flagged as missing, their absence does not invalidate the safety assessment for the observed evening and night periods.

Investigator correctly interprets Matter-scaled temperatures and appropriately dismisses the transient `None` telemetry at 19:30:00 as a network glitch rather than a device fault, adhering to the protocol guidelines.

The analysis correctly focuses on the evening cooking sequence (C17) and late-night status (C22) to assess safety, noting the hazard mitigation (cook surface off, window contact state change).

The reference to '5 lock state flips' in the missing information appears to be a carryover from triage hints rather than observed data, but correctly highlights the lack of security logs.

No protocol-format misunderstandings detected. The evidence provided is sufficient to conclude a safe status for the monitored timeline.

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Layout
Layout: 两室一厅 (2BR)
- balcony: 洗衣机<laundry_washer>, 阳台灯<onoff_light>, 阳台门传感器<contact_sensor>
- bathroom: 卫生间漏水传感器<water_leak_detector>, 卫生间灯<onoff_light>, 卫生间运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- entrance: 入户门传感器<contact_sensor>, 入户门锁<door_lock>, 玄关灯<onoff_light>, 玄关运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- kitchen: 厨房温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 厨房灯<onoff_light>, 厨房灶具<cook_surface>, 厨房烟雾报警器<smoke_co_alarm>, 厨房窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 洗碗机<dishwasher>
- living_room: 客厅主灯<dimmable_light>, 客厅温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 客厅空调<air_conditioner>, 客厅窗帘<window_covering>, 客厅窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 客厅落地灯<onoff_light>, 客厅运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- master_bedroom: 主卧温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 主卧灯<dimmable_light>, 主卧空调<air_conditioner>, 主卧窗帘<window_covering>, 主卧窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 主卧运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- second_bedroom: 次卧温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 次卧灯<dimmable_light>, 次卧窗帘<window_covering>, 次卧窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 次卧运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>

## Deterministic Signals
{
  "room_activity": {
    "living_room": 403,
    "master_bedroom": 515,
    "second_bedroom": 336,
    "kitchen": 304,
    "bathroom": 48,
    "entrance": 228
  },
  "attribute_frequency": {
    "MeasuredValue": 1158,
    "Occupancy": 640,
    "OnOff": 15,
    "StateValue": 7,
    "LockState": 5,
    "SmokeState": 1,
    "SystemMode": 1,
    "OperationalState": 1,
    "CurrentPositionLiftPercent100ths": 1
  },
  "lock_state_flips": 5,
  "occupancy_events": 640,
  "temperature_patterns": [],
  "value_format_hints": {
    "temperature": "MeasuredValue is shown as Celsius with the raw integer preserved in parentheses.",
    "occupancy": "0=unoccupied, 1=occupied",
    "lock_state": "enumerated lock state rendered as label +

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Triage
{
  "primary_task_profile": "composite-safety",
  "secondary_task_profile": "none",
  "query_anchor": {
    "target_rooms": [
      "living_room",
      "master_bedroom",
      "second_bedroom",
      "kitchen",
      "bathroom",
      "entrance",
      "balcony"
    ],
    "target_devices": [
      "temperature_sensor",
      "occupancy_sensor",
      "door_lock",
      "smoke_co_alarm",
      "water_leak_detector",
      "cook_surface",
      "contact_sensor",
      "onoff_light",
      "air_conditioner"
    ],
    "target_question": "判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险"
  },
  "focus_rooms": [
    "kitchen",
    "entrance",
    "bathroom",
    "living_room",
    "master_bedroom"
  ],
  "focus_devices": [
    "smoke_co_alarm",
    "water_leak_detector",
    "door_lock",
    "cook_surface",
    "temperature_sensor",
    "occupancy_sensor"
  ],
  "focus_chunk_ids": [
    "C00",
    "C06",
    "C17",
    "C22"
  ],
  "suspected_patterns": [
    "Routine occupancy and temperature monitoring",
    "Lock state transitions",
    "High telemetry frequency (alarmish_count)",
    "Evening/night activity patterns"
  ],
  "why_these_chunks": [
    "C00 establishes early morning baseline and unoccupied states",
    "C06 captures morning wake-up, occupancy transitions, and initial activity",
    "C17 shows evening activity, device usage, and occupancy patterns",
    "C22 covers late night status and winding down to assess overnight safety"
  ],
  "latent_task_profile": "composite-safety",
  "query_intent_profile": "composite-safety"
}

## Investigator

{
  "normal_hypotheses": [
    {
      "id": "N1",
      "description": "Normal evening routine with completed cookin


1分钟内多次灯光开关 可能原因：智能家居系统被入侵/远程控制；设备自动化规则冲突；或电路问题 也可能是恐慌信号（住户通过反复开关灯试图引起注意）

通知住户检查是否有人误操作或系统异常

The logs reflect a normal daily household routine with no evidence of safety hazards, device faults, or unattended activity.

Explanation: Occupancy transitions across the master bedroom, entrance, and living room follow a standard morning and evening pattern, indicating typical household activity without irregular access or intrusion.

Explanation: The kitchen cook surface was active for approximately 22.5 minutes (18:46:30-19:09), a standard duration for meal preparation, with no hazardous temperature escalation, smoke/CO alarm triggers, or sustained environmental stress.

Explanation: Transient `None` readings from the kitchen temperature sensor at 18:47 and 19:10 immediately recovered to baseline, consistent with routine telemetry scheduling or minor environmental interference rather than a hardware fault or safety event.

Explanation: The unattended cooking hypothesis relies primarily on missing kitchen occupancy logs; per composite-safety criteria, this absence-based assumption combined with a short, normal cooking duration and stable room temperatures does not constitute a valid anomaly.

Cook surface active for ~22.5 minutes with no alarm triggers or temperature spikes.

Stable temperature baselines across all monitored rooms (22.5°C-25.4°C) throughout the day.

Brief kitchen temperature sensor dropouts that recovered immediately without repeated failure.

Verify kitchen occupancy sensor placement and reporting frequency to ensure complete coverage during cooking windows.

Review smoke/CO alarm and water leak detector logs when available to finalize the comprehensive safety assessment.

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

Daily occupancy routine
Cooking activity
Lock state transitions
Temperature stability

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

Occupancy transitions across master bedroom, entrance, and living room align with typical morning (07:40-08:40) and evening (18:40-19:30, 23:00-23:55) activity patterns.

Kitchen cook surface was active for approximately 22.5 minutes (18:46:30 to 19:09), which is consistent with standard cooking duration.

Temperatures across all monitored rooms remained stable and within a comfortable range (22.5°C to 25.4°C) throughout the day.

Brief kitchen temperature sensor dropouts (`None` at 18:47 and 19:10) are transient and immediately recovered, likely due to routine telemetry scheduling or minor environmental interference rather than hardware failure.

Does not fully account for the absence of explicit kitchen occupancy logs during the cooking window, though this may be due to sensor placement or reporting frequency.

Potential unattended cooking or kitchen environmental stress.

Kitchen cook surface was activated at 18:46:30 and remained on until 19:09, while the kitchen occupancy sensor never logged an 'occupied' state (only master bedroom, entrance, and living room did).

Kitchen temperature sensor reported `None` at 18:47 and 19:10, coinciding with active cooking and subsequent dishwasher use, suggesting possible temporary heat/humidity interference or sensor stress.

Dishwasher activation at 19:26 occurred while kitchen occupancy was still unlogged, indicating potential lack of direct supervision in the kitchen area.

Cooking duration (~22.5 mins) is well within normal limits for meal preparation.

No fire, smoke, or CO alarm events were triggered.

Temperature readings did not show hazardous escalation or sustained spikes.

Sensor dropouts were brief and recovered immediately, failing to meet the threshold for `sensor_malfunction` or `safety_device_failure`.

Cook surface OnOff timeline (18:46:30-19:09) contrasted with the complete absence of kitchen occupancy logs during that window.

Kitchen temperature sensor `None` readings at 18:47 and 19:10, temporally linked to active cooking and appliance usage.

Stable temperature baselines across all other rooms, ruling out systemic environmental hazards.

Logs from smoke/CO alarms and water leak detectors to confirm absence of triggered safety events.

Detailed lock state transition logs to contextualize the 5 recorded lock flips.

Kitchen occupancy sensor placement and reporting frequency configuration.

Confirmation of whether the cook surface was manually turned off or if an auto-shutoff feature was active.

Smoke/CO alarm trigger logs
Water leak detector logs
Door lock state transition details

The unattended cooking hypothesis (A1) relies primarily on missing kitchen occupancy logs and a transient `None` temperature reading. Per protocol, this constitutes a high false-alarm risk, as it lacks hazardous escalation, alarm triggers, or sustained sensor failure. The investigator correctly identifies these weaknesses but should explicitly classify this as a low-severity monitoring item rather than a primary safety risk in the final verdict.

The investigation correctly interprets Matter-scaled temperatures and occupancy transitions, and the selected chunks (C00, C06, C17, C22) adequately cover the baseline, routine, trigger, and outcome phases.

Missing checks for smoke/CO alarms, water leak detectors, and door lock transitions were noted. Since these devices are absent from the provided chunks, the safety conclusion is appropriately bounded by available data, but the final report should acknowledge this data limitation.

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Layout
Layout: 两室一厅 (2BR)
- balcony: 洗衣机<laundry_washer>, 阳台灯<onoff_light>, 阳台门传感器<contact_sensor>
- bathroom: 卫生间漏水传感器<water_leak_detector>, 卫生间灯<onoff_light>, 卫生间运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- entrance: 入户门传感器<contact_sensor>, 入户门锁<door_lock>, 玄关灯<onoff_light>, 玄关运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- kitchen: 厨房温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 厨房灯<onoff_light>, 厨房灶具<cook_surface>, 厨房烟雾报警器<smoke_co_alarm>, 厨房窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 洗碗机<dishwasher>
- living_room: 客厅主灯<dimmable_light>, 客厅温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 客厅空调<air_conditioner>, 客厅窗帘<window_covering>, 客厅窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 客厅落地灯<onoff_light>, 客厅运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- master_bedroom: 主卧温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 主卧灯<dimmable_light>, 主卧空调<air_conditioner>, 主卧窗帘<window_covering>, 主卧窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 主卧运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- second_bedroom: 次卧温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 次卧灯<dimmable_light>, 次卧窗帘<window_covering>, 次卧窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 次卧运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>

## Deterministic Signals
{
  "room_activity": {
    "living_room": 407,
    "master_bedroom": 517,
    "second_bedroom": 336,
    "kitchen": 303,
    "bathroom": 48,
    "entrance": 229
  },
  "attribute_frequency": {
    "MeasuredValue": 1156,
    "Occupancy": 642,
    "OnOff": 22,
    "StateValue": 7,
    "LockState": 5,
    "SystemMode": 1,
    "OperationalState": 1,
    "CurrentPositionLiftPercent100ths": 1
  },
  "lock_state_flips": 5,
  "occupancy_events": 642,
  "temperature_patterns": [],
  "value_format_hints": {
    "temperature": "MeasuredValue is shown as Celsius with the raw integer preserved in parentheses.",
    "occupancy": "0=unoccupied, 1=occupied",
    "lock_state": "enumerated lock state rendered as label + raw code"
  }
}

##

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Triage
{
  "primary_task_profile": "composite-safety",
  "secondary_task_profile": "none",
  "query_anchor": {
    "target_rooms": [
      "entrance",
      "kitchen",
      "living_room",
      "master_bedroom",
      "second_bedroom",
      "bathroom",
      "balcony"
    ],
    "target_devices": [
      "door_lock",
      "cook_surface",
      "smoke_co_alarm",
      "water_leak_detector",
      "occupancy_sensor",
      "temperature_sensor"
    ],
    "target_question": "判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。"
  },
  "focus_rooms": [
    "entrance",
    "kitchen",
    "living_room",
    "master_bedroom"
  ],
  "focus_devices": [
    "door_lock",
    "cook_surface",
    "smoke_co_alarm",
    "water_leak_detector",
    "occupancy_sensor",
    "temperature_sensor"
  ],
  "focus_chunk_ids": [
    "C00",
    "C06",
    "C17",
    "C22"
  ],
  "suspected_patterns": [
    "Daily occupancy routine",
    "Cooking activity",
    "Lock state transitions",
    "Temperature stability"
  ],
  "why_these_chunks": [
    "C00 establishes baseline overnight state and sensor calibration",
    "C06 captures morning occupancy transitions and routine activation context",
    "C17 highlights kitchen cooking activity and potential fire/water risk context",
    "C22 confirms evening/night security, lock activity, and occupancy patterns to complete the 24-hour safety assessment"
  ],
  "latent_task_profile": "composite-safety",
  "query_intent_profile": "composite-safety"
}

## Investigator

{
  "normal_hypotheses": [
    {
      "id": "N1",
      "description": "Normal daily household routine with standard meal preparation.",
      "evidence": [
        "Occupancy transitions across ma


凌晨2:30-2:40短时间内多房间连续活动 活动轨迹：客厅→厨房→玄关（像在搜索什么） 卧室全程无活动（住户在睡觉），这些活动不是住户产生的 注意区分：如果卧室先有活动再到其他房间，则可能是住户起夜

The cooking event shows no hazardous thermal escalation, indicating a safe routine despite missing kitchen occupancy logs.

Explanation: The cook surface was active from 18:56:30 to 19:54:00, but the kitchen temperature steadily declined from 25.40°C to 22.62°C throughout this period, directly contradicting the hazardous escalation expected in an unattended cooking or fire risk scenario.

Explanation: The transient `None` readings at 18:57 and 19:55 recovered immediately to baseline values, indicating typical network/sensor polling gaps rather than persistent faults or safety alarms.

Explanation: While explicit kitchen occupancy logs are missing, the consistent thermal cooldown and the presence of occupants in adjacent rooms (living room/entrance) strongly support a normal, safely managed cooking routine rather than an unattended hazard.

Explanation: Following the supervisor's guidance to weight the thermal trend heavily, the evidence refutes the unattended cooking hypothesis and confirms a safe state.

Kitchen temperature consistently decreased from 25.40°C (19:00) to 22.62°C (19:55) while the cook surface was ON.

Transient sensor dropouts at 18:57 and 19:55 recovered immediately without triggering alarms.

Living room and entrance occupancy remained active, confirming household presence during the cooking window.

No immediate action required; the environment is currently safe.

Consider installing a dedicated kitchen occupancy sensor to improve future supervision verification and reduce reliance on thermal inference.

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险

Daily occupancy rhythm and presence detection

Kitchen temperature fluctuations during cooking

Door lock state transitions and access patterns

Appliance operational states (dishwasher, cook surface)

C00 establishes baseline overnight conditions with minimal occupancy and stable temperatures.

C05 captures the morning transition, initial occupancy detection, and rising temperatures.

Together, these chunks cover the full daily cycle, enabling a comprehensive assessment of environmental stability, human activity patterns, and potential safety hazards without prematurely narrowing to a single device.

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险

Normal evening cooking routine with transient telemetry glitches. The cook surface was activated at 18:56:30 for dinner preparation and deactivated at 19:54:00. The kitchen temperature peaked earlier (18:30) and gradually normalized by 19:55. The transient `None` readings at 18:57 and 19:55 are typical telemetry dropouts (e.g., network congestion or sensor polling gaps) that recovered immediately without indicating a fault. Living room and entrance occupancy confirms household presence, and the eventual shutoff and temperature stabilization indicate successful mitigation.

Cook surface turned ON at 18:56:30 and OFF at 19:54:00, consistent with a standard cooking duration.

Kitchen temperature steadily decreased from 25.40 C (19:00) to 22.62 C (19:55) while the cook surface was ON, suggesting low heat output, sensor distance from the heat source, or rapid cooldown (e.g., induction cooktop).

Sensor dropouts at 18:57:00 and 19:55:00 recovered immediately to baseline values, indicating transient network/sensor polling issues rather than persistent faults.

Living room and entrance occupancy remained active throughout, confirming household presence and likely supervision.

Relies on the assumption that the ~57-minute cook surface duration was supervised despite missing kitchen occupancy logs.

Does not fully explain why the cook surface was left on for nearly an hour without a corresponding kitchen occupancy event or explicit timer/standby state.

Unattended cooking risk. The cook surface remained active for approximately 57 minutes (18:56:30 to 19:54:00) without any logged kitchen occupancy events, suggesting the user may have left the kitchen unattended. The transient sensor dropouts at 18:57 and 19:55 could indicate environmental stress or device instability near the heat source. Although the cook surface was eventually turned off and temperatures normalized, the prolonged activation without direct supervision presents a latent fire risk that was only mitigated by the eventual manual shutoff.

Cook surface ON from 18:56:30 to 19:54:00 (~57.5 minutes) with zero kitchen occupancy logs during this window.

Transient `None` telemetry dropouts at 18:57:00 and 19:55:00 coinciding with cook surface activity, potentially indicating sensor stress or environmental interference.

Living room/entrance occupancy suggests the occupant may have been in an adjacent room, increasing the likelihood of unsupervised kitchen activity.

No smoke/CO alarm triggers observed, but absence of logs does not rule out delayed or unlogged mitigation.

Lacks corroboration from smoke/CO alarms or explicit kitchen occupancy logs to confirm absence of supervision.

The steady temperature decline while the cook surface was ON contradicts typical unattended heating escalation, suggesting the device may have been on a low setting or in standby, weakening the fire risk severity.

Eventual manual shutoff and temperature normalization indicate successful mitigation, reducing immediate danger.

Cook surface ON from 18:56:30 to 19:54:00 without concurrent kitchen occupancy logs.

Transient `None` telemetry dropouts at 18:57:00 and 19:55:00 coinciding with cook surface activity.

Kitchen temperature normalization to baseline (22.62 C) by 19:55:00, confirming heat source deactivation and environmental recovery.

Smoke/CO alarm status during the 18:56-20:05 window.

Direct kitchen occupancy sensor logs to confirm presence/absence during cook surface activation.

Network/device logs explaining the 18:57 and 19:55 sensor dropouts.

Cook surface operational state logs (e.g., power level, timer, or standby mode) to verify if it was actively heating or just in standby.

Explicitly correlate cook surface activation with the consistent kitchen temperature decline to rule out fire hazard

Acknowledge that the absence of kitchen_occupancy logs in the provided dataset limits supervision verification, but thermal data indicates no escalation

Distinguish between telemetry gaps and actual safety events, avoiding over-reliance on missing occupancy logs for risk classification

The 'unattended cooking' hypothesis relies heavily on missing kitchen occupancy logs and a transient `None` reading, despite clear thermal evidence showing a consistent temperature decline during the cook surface's active period. This contradicts hazardous escalation and significantly lowers the fire risk.

The analysis drifts into debating telemetry quality and missing logs rather than synthesizing a definitive safety verdict. The temperature trend is the strongest indicator of safety here and should be weighted more heavily.

Refine the investigation to explicitly conclude that the cooking event was likely safe based on thermal data, noting the dataset limitation regarding kitchen occupancy. No additional chunks are strictly necessary if the thermal trend is accepted as conclusive for safety assessment.

Normal evening cooking routine with transient sensor glitch. The cook surface was activated for meal preparation, causing an expected temperature rise in the kitchen. The temperature sensor dropout at 18:57:00 was likely a brief network glitch or minor environmental interference that resolved quickly. The cook surface was presumably turned off manually after cooking, as kitchen temperatures normalized to baseline (~22.7 C) by 20:10:00. Continuous occupancy in the living room and entrance indicates the household was present and likely supervising the adjacent area.

Cook surface OnOff = on at 18:56:30, followed by normal kitchen temperature rise (25.15 C to 27.17 C).

Kitchen temperature sensor recovers at 19:00:00 and returns to baseline (~22.7 C) by 20:10:00 in C17.

Living room and entrance occupancy remains high (1) throughout C15 and C17, indicating presence.

Dishwasher operational state = 1 at 20:05:05, consistent with typical evening chores.

Relies on the assumption that the cook surface was turned off manually, as no deactivation event is logged.

Does not fully explain the exact timing of the sensor dropout coinciding precisely with cook surface activation.

Potential unattended cooking risk. The cook surface was activated at 18:56:30 but no deactivation event is recorded in the logs spanning until 21:05. The kitchen temperature sensor immediately dropped to None at 18:57:00, creating a monitoring blind spot during active heating. Although living room and entrance occupancy is high, the absence of direct kitchen occupancy logs and the prolonged active state of the cook surface without a recorded off-event suggest a risk of unattended cooking. The eventual temperature normalization implies the heat source was likely removed, but the lack of explicit confirmation leaves a safety gap.

Cook surface OnOff = on at 18:56:30 with no corresponding Off event logged through C17.

Kitchen temperature sensor = None at 18:57:00, immediately following cook surface activation.

No explicit kitchen occupancy logs during the 18:56-20:10 window, only adjacent room occupancy.

Kitchen temperature remains elevated relative to baseline until 20:10:00, indicating sustained heat presence.

Living room and entrance occupancy suggests someone was home nearby, reducing the likelihood of complete abandonment.

Temperature normalization by 20:10:00 strongly implies the cook surface was eventually turned off, mitigating the worst-case scenario.

Kitchen temperature sensor temporary fault or environmental interference. The sensor reading None at 18:57:00 occurs exactly 30 seconds after the cook surface turns on. This timing strongly suggests the sensor was affected by heat, steam, or a transient network glitch during high-heat appliance operation. Although it recovered within 3 minutes, this indicates a potential vulnerability in sensor placement or resilience during cooking events, creating a temporary blind spot for safety monitoring.

Kitchen temp sensor = None at 18:57:00, precisely 30 seconds after cook surface activation.

Sensor recovers at 19:00:00, indicating a transient rather than permanent failure.

Temperature spike in kitchen (up to 27.17 C) coincides with the dropout window.

Quick recovery (within 3 minutes) and lack of repeated occurrences suggest this is an isolated incident rather than a persistent hardware fault.

Could be attributed to standard Wi-Fi/Zigbee congestion during peak appliance usage rather than a device defect.

Cook surface OnOff = on at 18:56:30 with no recorded deactivation event through 21:05.

Kitchen temperature sensor = None at 18:57:00, immediately following cook surface activation.

Kitchen temperature returns to baseline (~22.7 C) by 20:10:00 in C17.

Continuous occupancy in living room/entrance but absence of explicit kitchen occupancy logs during the cooking window.

Explicit cook surface deactivation event to confirm manual shutoff.

Direct kitchen occupancy sensor logs to verify supervision during the cooking period.

Smoke/CO alarm status or any alarm events during the 18:56-20:10 window.

Network diagnostics to determine if the sensor dropout was a communication failure or environmental interference.

Smoke/CO alarm status during 18:56-20:10

Explicit cook surface deactivation event

Network/device logs explaining the 18:57 sensor dropout

The investigation correctly identifies the cooking event and the transient sensor dropout, but overlooks a critical 55-minute logging gap between C15 (ends 19:10) and C17 (starts 20:05).

The unattended cooking risk hypothesis rests mainly on missing OFF logs, another room showing occupancy, and a single transient telemetry gap without hazardous escalation, which aligns with high false-alarm risk criteria.

Temperature normalization to baseline by 20:10 strongly indicates the heat source was removed, mitigating the immediate risk.

Retrieve C16 to bridge the gap, confirm the cook surface state, and verify sensor recovery behavior.

No protocol-format misunderstandings detected; temperature scaling and occupancy booleans are interpreted correctly.

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Layout
Layout: 两室一厅 (2BR)
- balcony: 洗衣机<laundry_washer>, 阳台灯<onoff_light>, 阳台门传感器<contact_sensor>
- bathroom: 卫生间漏水传感器<water_leak_detector>, 卫生间灯<onoff_light>, 卫生间运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- entrance: 入户门传感器<contact_sensor>, 入户门锁<door_lock>, 玄关灯<onoff_light>, 玄关运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- kitchen: 厨房温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 厨房灯<onoff_light>, 厨房灶具<cook_surface>, 厨房烟雾报警器<smoke_co_alarm>, 厨房窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 洗碗机<dishwasher>
- living_room: 客厅主灯<dimmable_light>, 客厅温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 客厅空调<air_conditioner>, 客厅窗帘<window_covering>, 客厅窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 客厅落地灯<onoff_light>, 客厅运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- master_bedroom: 主卧温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 主卧灯<dimmable_light>, 主卧空调<air_conditioner>, 主卧窗帘<window_covering>, 主卧窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 主卧运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- second_bedroom: 次卧温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 次卧灯<dimmable_light>, 次卧窗帘<window_covering>, 次卧窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 次卧运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>

## Deterministic Signals
{
  "room_activity": {
    "living_room": 404,
    "master_bedroom": 336,
    "second_bedroom": 336,
    "kitchen": 299,
    "bathroom": 58,
    "entrance": 232
  },
  "attribute_frequency": {
    "MeasuredValue": 1154,
    "Occupancy": 480,
    "OnOff": 16,
    "StateValue": 5,
    "LockState": 4,
    "SystemMode": 1,
    "OperationalState": 1
  },
  "lock_state_flips": 4,
  "occupancy_events": 480,
  "temperature_patterns": [],
  "value_format_hints": {
    "temperature": "MeasuredValue is shown as Celsius with the raw integer preserved in parentheses.",
    "occupancy": "0=unoccupied, 1=occupied",
    "lock_state": "enumerated lock state rendered as label + raw code"
  }
}

## Chunk Index
[
  {
    "chunk_id": "C00",

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Triage
{
  "primary_task_profile": "composite-safety",
  "secondary_task_profile": "none",
  "query_anchor": {
    "target_rooms": [
      "kitchen",
      "entrance",
      "living_room",
      "bathroom",
      "master_bedroom",
      "second_bedroom",
      "balcony"
    ],
    "target_devices": [
      "temperature_sensor",
      "occupancy_sensor",
      "door_lock",
      "smoke_co_alarm",
      "water_leak_detector",
      "cook_surface",
      "dishwasher"
    ],
    "target_question": "判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险"
  },
  "focus_rooms": [
    "kitchen",
    "entrance",
    "living_room",
    "bathroom"
  ],
  "focus_devices": [
    "temperature_sensor",
    "occupancy_sensor",
    "door_lock",
    "smoke_co_alarm",
    "water_leak_detector",
    "cook_surface",
    "dishwasher"
  ],
  "focus_chunk_ids": [
    "C00",
    "C05",
    "C15",
    "C17"
  ],
  "suspected_patterns": [
    "Daily occupancy rhythm and presence detection",
    "Kitchen temperature fluctuations during cooking",
    "Door lock state transitions and access patterns",
    "Appliance operational states (dishwasher, cook surface)"
  ],
  "why_these_chunks": [
    "C00 establishes baseline overnight conditions with minimal occupancy and stable temperatures.",
    "C05 captures the morning transition, initial occupancy detection, and rising temperatures.",
    "C15 highlights evening peak activity, high living room/entrance occupancy, and a notable kitchen temperature spike (25.78 C) relevant to cooking safety.",
    "C17 shows sustained evening occupancy and dishwasher operation, providing context for appliance safety and human presence overlap.",
    "Together, these chunks cover


玄关运动 + 门锁解锁失败

密码错误（小孩可能记不准密码）

跟 INS-02 的区别：这里不是暴力破解，只有1-2次尝试，且家中有其他房间的活动（说明有人在家）

Transient lock operation failure at the entrance created a temporary security gap, though the mechanism recovered successfully via manual override.

Explanation: Explicit LockOperationError events were logged at 14:12:05 and 14:12:15 in C15, indicating the front door lock failed to execute commands while the entrance was occupied.

Explanation: C18 shows a subsequent manual lock operation at 16:35:00 followed by the door being opened, confirming the lock mechanism remained functional but experienced a transient fault that was resolved by user intervention.

Explanation: Other telemetry, including temperature sensors and occupancy patterns across C05 and C20, reflects normal daily routines with expected brief sensor dropouts during cooking, ruling out broader environmental or intrusion risks.

Explanation: The combination of explicit error codes and transient recovery supports a lock malfunction classification with medium confidence, as the immediate risk was mitigated but the underlying fault warrants attention.

C15: front_door_lock | Event: LockOperationError(OperationError=1, OperationSource=3) at 14:12:05 and 14:12:15.

C18: front_door_lock | Event: LockOperation(LockOperationType=1, OperationSource=Manual) at 16:35:00, followed by front_door_contact open at 16:35:02.

C05/C20: Normal cooking sequences with expected temperature sensor dropouts and consistent occupancy shifts.

Inspect the front door lock for physical obstructions, mechanical wear, or alignment issues.

Verify battery levels and network connectivity for the lock to rule out power or signal interference.

Monitor for recurrence of lock operation errors and apply any available firmware updates to the smart lock.

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

The home is operating under normal daily routines with stable environmental conditions. The front door lock errors were transient glitches resolved by manual override, and kitchen temperature sensor dropouts are consistent with temporary heat/moisture interference or network congestion during appliance use. Cooking events are short and occur while occupants are present in adjacent rooms, indicating supervised activity.

C05 and C20 show consistent occupancy shifts between bathroom, bedrooms, and living/dining areas, matching typical morning and evening routines.

Temperature sensors across all rooms report stable, comfortable values (23.00-25.16 C) with no sustained drift or impossible transitions.

C18 shows a successful manual lock operation and subsequent door contact state change, confirming the lock mechanism is functional after the earlier error.

Kitchen cook surface usage in C05 (~30 min) and C20 is brief, and the kitchen temperature sensor recovers quickly after each activation, suggesting normal appliance operation rather than a hazard.

Assumes the manual override in C18 fully secured the door immediately after the 14:12 error, without explicit confirmation of the door's locked state during the gap.

Relies on adjacent room occupancy to infer supervision during cooking, rather than direct kitchen presence logs.

Lock operation failure posing a temporary security gap. The front door lock explicitly reported operation errors twice in quick succession while the entrance was occupied, indicating a failure to execute a lock/unlock command. This creates a window where the door may have been left unsecured or mechanically jammed, presenting a direct security risk.

C15: `front_door_lock | Event: LockOperationError(OperationError=1, OperationSource=3)` logged at 14:12:05 and 14:12:15.

Entrance occupancy is active (`raw=1`) during the error window, confirming someone was present at the door when the mechanism failed.

C18: A manual lock operation is logged at 16:35:00, followed immediately by `front_door_contact | BooleanState.StateValue = false` (door open) at 16:35:02, indicating the door was manually accessed and left open, potentially compensating for or following the earlier malfunction.

Structured signals confirm 5 lock state flips and highlight 'Lock operation failure/error at entrance' as a suspected pattern.

The error was isolated and resolved by manual intervention; there is no evidence of forced entry, prolonged insecure state, or repeated failures outside this window.

The exact intent of the failed operation (auto-lock vs remote command) is not explicitly detailed, making it difficult to determine if it was a false trigger or a genuine mechanical failure.

C15: Explicit `LockOperationError` events at 14:12:05 and 14:12:15 directly contradict normal lock operation.

C18: Manual lock operation at 16:35:00 followed by open door contact at 16:35:02, showing recovery and subsequent door state.

C05/C20: Kitchen cook surface activation consistently followed 30 seconds later by `kitchen_temp_sensor | TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue = None`, indicating a predictable telemetry dropout pattern during heat generation.

Explicit logs from smoke, CO, or water leak detectors to confirm the status of the full safety system.

Full lock state history immediately preceding the 14:12 errors to verify if the door was actually left in an unlocked state.

Direct kitchen occupancy logs during cook surface activation to confirm physical supervision of the cooking activity.

Battery or connectivity status for the front door lock and kitchen temperature sensor to rule out power/network causes for the errors and dropouts.

Explicit battery/connectivity status for front door lock and kitchen temp sensor to rule out power/network causes.

Direct kitchen occupancy logs during cook surface activation to confirm physical supervision.

Investigator correctly interprets Matter-scaled temperatures (centi-degrees) and occupancy booleans, avoiding naive literal readings.

Lock error in C15 is explicit (`LockOperationError`), which lowers false-alarm risk for lock malfunction compared to stories relying solely on delayed auto-locks or unobserved gaps.

Manual recovery in C18 shows the lock mechanism remained functional; the transient nature of the error is well captured.

Cooking supervision is reasonably inferred from adjacent room occupancy patterns, and the investigator appropriately flags this as a weakness rather than a certainty.

Analysis correctly distinguishes between direct fault evidence (lock errors) and behavioral telemetry dropouts (kitchen temp `None` during cooking).

No protocol-format misunderstandings detected. Evidence covers trigger, context, and outcome chunks as triaged. Proceed to final verdict.

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Layout
Layout: 三室两厅 (3BR)
- balcony: 洗衣机<laundry_washer>, 阳台灯<onoff_light>, 阳台门传感器<contact_sensor>
- dining_room: 餐厅灯<dimmable_light>, 餐厅运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- entrance: 入户门传感器<contact_sensor>, 入户门锁<door_lock>, 玄关灯<onoff_light>, 玄关运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- kids_room: 儿童房温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 儿童房灯<dimmable_light>, 儿童房窗帘<window_covering>, 儿童房窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 儿童房运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- kitchen: 厨房温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 厨房漏水传感器<water_leak_detector>, 厨房灯<onoff_light>, 厨房灶具<cook_surface>, 厨房烟雾报警器<smoke_co_alarm>, 厨房窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 洗碗机<dishwasher>
- living_room: 客厅主灯<dimmable_light>, 客厅副灯<dimmable_light>, 客厅氛围灯<onoff_light>, 客厅温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 客厅烟雾报警器<smoke_co_alarm>, 客厅空调<air_conditioner>, 客厅窗帘1<window_covering>, 客厅窗户传感器1<contact_sensor>, 客厅窗户传感器2<contact_sensor>, 客厅运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- master_bathroom: 主卫漏水传感器<water_leak_detector>, 主卫灯<onoff_light>, 主卫运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- master_bedroom: 主卧床头灯<onoff_light>, 主卧温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 主卧灯<dimmable_light>, 主卧空调<air_conditioner>, 主卧窗帘<window_covering>, 主卧窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 主卧运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- second_bathroom: 次卫漏水传感器<water_leak_detector>, 次卫灯<onoff_light>
- second_bedroom: 次卧灯<dimmable_light>, 次卧空调<air_conditioner>, 次卧窗帘<window_covering>, 次卧窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 次卧运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>

## Deterministic Signals
{
  "room_activity": {
    "living_room": 402,
    "master_bedroom": 516,
    "kids_room": 518,
    "kitchen": 303,
    "dining_room": 221,
    "second_bedroom": 48,
    "master_bathroom": 54,
    "entrance": 230,
    "second_bathroom": 1
  },
  "attribute_frequency": {
    "MeasuredValue": 1156,
    "Occupancy": 1087,
    "OnOff": 26,

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Triage
{
  "primary_task_profile": "composite-safety",
  "secondary_task_profile": "device-health",
  "query_anchor": {
    "target_rooms": [
      "entrance",
      "kitchen",
      "living_room",
      "master_bedroom",
      "kids_room"
    ],
    "target_devices": [
      "front_door_lock",
      "occupancy_sensors",
      "temperature_sensors",
      "water_leak_detectors",
      "smoke_co_alarms"
    ],
    "target_question": "判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。"
  },
  "focus_rooms": [
    "entrance",
    "kitchen",
    "living_room",
    "master_bedroom"
  ],
  "focus_devices": [
    "front_door_lock",
    "occupancy_sensors",
    "temperature_sensors",
    "water_leak_detectors"
  ],
  "focus_chunk_ids": [
    "C15",
    "C18",
    "C05",
    "C20"
  ],
  "suspected_patterns": [
    "Lock operation failure/error at entrance",
    "Potential security gap due to lock malfunction",
    "Occupancy patterns indicating normal daily routine vs anomalies"
  ],
  "why_these_chunks": [
    "C15 captures the front door lock operation errors, a direct security trigger.",
    "C18 shows subsequent manual lock operation and state, providing recovery/consequence context.",
    "C05 and C20 provide morning and evening occupancy/activity baselines to assess overall home safety and routine patterns."
  ],
  "latent_task_profile": "composite-safety | device-health",
  "query_intent_profile": "composite-safety"
}

## Investigator

{
  "normal_hypotheses": [
    {
      "id": "N1",
      "description": "The home is operating under normal daily routines with stable environmental conditions. The front door lock errors were transient glitches resolved by manual override, and k


工作日上午学校时段
家长已出门（LockOperation 记录）
仅儿童房有活动信号，其他房间无人
活动模式像小孩（仅在一个房间）

通知家长确认孩子是否生病在家/逃学

The home is in a normal, unoccupied state with stable environmental conditions and no detected safety hazards or device faults.

Explanation: All occupancy sensors consistently report an unoccupied state across all monitored rooms throughout the logged period.

Explanation: Indoor temperatures rise gradually and linearly from approximately 23.0°C to 25.5°C, consistent with passive solar gain in an empty house and well within safe comfort limits.

Explanation: The 07:30 door lock event shows a single lock/unlock sequence, aligning with a routine departure or check rather than forced entry or malfunction.

Explanation: The absence of smoke, CO, and water leak telemetry, along with temporal gaps, represents a data limitation rather than an active hazard; following supervisor guidance, these gaps should not be elevated to safety risks without corroborating evidence.

Consistent `OccupancySensing.Occupancy = unoccupied (raw=0)` across all rooms.

Gradual, linear temperature increase (~23.0°C to 25.5°C) without erratic spikes or unsafe thresholds.

Single 07:30 lock/unlock event consistent with routine operation.

No explicit alarm, fault, or hazardous sequence events in the provided logs.

Verify whether temporal gaps indicate data dropout or merely lower sampling rates.

Request missing telemetry logs for smoke, CO, and water leak detectors to complete the comprehensive safety assessment.

Correlate the steady temperature rise with HVAC/thermostat logs or external weather data to rule out equipment malfunction.

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

Consistent indoor temperatures (22-25°C) across all monitored rooms

Predominantly unoccupied state with isolated occupancy events

Zero lock state changes or access attempts

C00 establishes baseline overnight telemetry and environmental stability

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

Normal unoccupied state with expected diurnal temperature variation. The home is consistently reported as unoccupied across all rooms. Temperatures rise gradually from ~23.0°C to ~25.5°C over the logged period, which is consistent with passive solar gain or baseline heating in an empty house. The 07:30 lock/unlock sequence aligns with a resident leaving or performing a routine door check, matching the unoccupied context.

All occupancy sensors consistently report `OccupancySensing.Occupancy = unoccupied (raw=0)` from 01:10 to 11:30.

Temperature increases linearly and slowly (~0.25°C/hour), staying within a safe comfort range (max 25.5°C).

Single lock/unlock event at 07:30 (`LockOperationType=1` then `0`) is consistent with departure or a brief check, not a forced entry or malfunction.

Relies on occupancy sensors being accurate; does not account for potential blind spots during unlogged temporal gaps.

Does not explain the heating source without thermostat/HVAC logs.

Unmonitored Safety Environment due to missing device telemetry and temporal gaps. The complete absence of smoke, CO, and water leak detector logs means any developing environmental hazard would go undetected. Additionally, large unlogged periods (09:00-10:10, 11:30-15:20, 23:00-01:10) leave the home's status unverified. The steady temperature rise lacks corroborating HVAC/thermostat logs, leaving the cause of heating unverified.

Target devices (smoke/CO/water leak) have zero log entries despite being explicitly listed in the query and focus devices.

Significant temporal gaps in telemetry coverage create monitoring blind spots where hazards or occupancy changes could occur unrecorded.

Temperature rises steadily without any corresponding thermostat or HVAC control logs to confirm intentional climate management.

The temperature remains well within safe limits (max 25.5°C), so the heating is not currently hazardous.

Missing logs represent a data/telemetry gap rather than direct evidence of device failure or an active emergency.

100% unoccupied occupancy readings across all monitored rooms throughout the entire logged timeframe.

Gradual, linear temperature increase (~23.0°C to 25.5°C) without corresponding HVAC/thermostat commands.

Isolated 07:30 lock/unlock sequence consistent with resident departure.

Complete absence of smoke, CO, and water leak detector telemetry.

Logs for smoke/CO/water leak detectors to verify environmental safety.

Thermostat or HVAC control logs to explain the steady temperature rise.

Continuous telemetry for the identified temporal gaps (09:00-10:10, 11:30-15:20, 23:00-01:10) to rule out unmonitored hazards or occupancy changes.

Context for the 07:30 door lock interaction (e.g., resident presence logs or camera feeds) to confirm it was a routine departure.

Verify if temporal gaps represent actual data dropout or merely lower sampling rates.

Assess the 07:30 door lock event for forced-entry indicators versus routine operation.

Correlate the steady temperature rise with HVAC/thermostat logs or external weather to rule out equipment malfunction.

Distinguish between missing telemetry (data gap) and active safety hazards; avoid declaring a safety risk solely based on absent logs.

The investigation correctly identifies missing smoke/CO/water leak logs but incorrectly elevates this data gap to a primary safety risk without corroboration, creating a high false-alarm risk.

Triage focus chunks (C00, C07, C11, C18) do not match the provided chunk set (C01-C06, C08), indicating a protocol mismatch or incomplete data provision.

The analysis should focus on interpreting the available temperature, occupancy, and lock data for actual safety implications rather than speculating on unmonitored devices.

Request the missing chunks to verify the claimed 24-hour coverage, and refine the safety conclusion to explicitly separate data limitations from detected hazards.

The home is in a normal, unoccupied residential state. Residents are likely away (e.g., work/school), resulting in consistent empty-house telemetry. Environmental conditions are stable, and security perimeters are intact.

All occupancy sensors report 0 (unoccupied) across all rooms for the entire 24-hour monitoring window, except for a single transient event.

Temperature sensors show stable, comfortable indoor readings (22.0°C - 25.6°C) with no sudden spikes or drops, indicating normal HVAC/environmental control.

Zero lock state flips or access attempts recorded, confirming no unauthorized entry or security breaches.

High telemetry frequency (every 5 minutes) with no dropped packets or fault codes, indicating healthy sensor communication.

Relies on the assumption that a completely empty house during daytime hours is expected; does not account for potential undetected hazards if safety devices (smoke/CO/leak) are offline or unmonitored in this log slice.

Does not fully explain the isolated 09:00 kids_room occupancy/light event, though it is likely benign.

Potential false occupancy trigger or brief, unsupervised activity in the children's room, compounded by a prolonged unoccupied state that may mask undetected hazards or sensor blind spots.

At 09:00:00, kids_room_occupancy briefly registers as 1 (occupied) simultaneously with kids_room_light turning on, followed by an immediate return to unoccupied (0) by 09:30:00.

The house remains completely unoccupied from 00:00 to 23:55, which, while typical, means any developing hazard (e.g., electrical fault, minor leak) would go unmitigated until residents return.

No corroborating activity in adjacent rooms or entrance to contextualize the 09:00 event.

A single transient occupancy spike and light activation are insufficient to confirm intrusion, child safety risk, or malfunction without repeated patterns or alarm triggers.

Temperature stability and zero lock changes strongly contradict active hazards or unauthorized access.

Prolonged absence is a standard residential pattern and not inherently anomalous.

Complete absence of occupancy across all zones for ~24 hours vs. the isolated 09:00 kids_room occupancy/light event.

Stable indoor temperatures (22-25°C) across all sensors, ruling out fire, unattended cooking, or HVAC failure.

Zero lock state changes, confirming no access attempts or security breaches.

Consistent 5-minute telemetry intervals with no fault/alarm events, indicating healthy device operation.

Actual household schedule or expected occupancy patterns to contextualize the 24-hour empty state.

Telemetry logs for smoke/CO/water leak detectors (listed as target devices but absent from chunks), which are critical for a complete safety assessment.

Context for the 09:00 kids_room light/occupancy event (e.g., scheduled automation, pet activity, or manual trigger).

Status of any recent maintenance, known sensor calibrations, or network connectivity issues.

Logs for smoke/CO/water leak detectors are completely absent despite being listed as targets.

Large temporal gaps exist between selected chunks (01:10-09:00, 10:10-14:00, 15:20-23:00) that may contain critical occupancy or safety events.

Verify if the 09:00 kids_room event correlates with any other device activity in adjacent timeframes.

Investigator correctly interprets Matter-scaled temperatures and identifies the transient 09:00 occupancy event as low-risk.

However, the selected chunks only cover ~4 hours of a 24-hour period, leaving large gaps where unmonitored hazards or occupancy changes could occur.

Critical safety devices (smoke/CO/water leak) are listed in the query but entirely missing from the provided logs; this must be explicitly flagged as a data gap.

Request intermediate chunks to ensure full 24-hour coverage and verify the absence/presence of safety device logs across the timeline.

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Layout
Layout: 三室两厅 (3BR)
- balcony: 洗衣机<laundry_washer>, 阳台灯<onoff_light>, 阳台门传感器<contact_sensor>
- dining_room: 餐厅灯<dimmable_light>, 餐厅运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- entrance: 入户门传感器<contact_sensor>, 入户门锁<door_lock>, 玄关灯<onoff_light>, 玄关运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- kids_room: 儿童房温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 儿童房灯<dimmable_light>, 儿童房窗帘<window_covering>, 儿童房窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 儿童房运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- kitchen: 厨房温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 厨房漏水传感器<water_leak_detector>, 厨房灯<onoff_light>, 厨房灶具<cook_surface>, 厨房烟雾报警器<smoke_co_alarm>, 厨房窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 洗碗机<dishwasher>
- living_room: 客厅主灯<dimmable_light>, 客厅副灯<dimmable_light>, 客厅氛围灯<onoff_light>, 客厅温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 客厅烟雾报警器<smoke_co_alarm>, 客厅空调<air_conditioner>, 客厅窗帘1<window_covering>, 客厅窗户传感器1<contact_sensor>, 客厅窗户传感器2<contact_sensor>, 客厅运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- master_bathroom: 主卫漏水传感器<water_leak_detector>, 主卫灯<onoff_light>, 主卫运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- master_bedroom: 主卧床头灯<onoff_light>, 主卧温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 主卧灯<dimmable_light>, 主卧空调<air_conditioner>, 主卧窗帘<window_covering>, 主卧窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 主卧运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- second_bathroom: 次卫漏水传感器<water_leak_detector>, 次卫灯<onoff_light>
- second_bedroom: 次卧灯<dimmable_light>, 次卧空调<air_conditioner>, 次卧窗帘<window_covering>, 次卧窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 次卧运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>

## Deterministic Signals
{
  "room_activity": {
    "living_room": 336,
    "master_bedroom": 336,
    "kids_room": 338,
    "kitchen": 288,
    "dining_room": 48,
    "second_bedroom": 48,
    "master_bathroom": 48,
    "entrance": 50
  },
  "attribute_frequency": {
    "MeasuredValue": 1152,
    "Occupancy": 337,
    "OnOff": 1
  },
  "lock_state_flips": 0,

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Triage
{
  "primary_task_profile": "composite-safety",
  "secondary_task_profile": "none",
  "query_anchor": {
    "target_rooms": [
      "all"
    ],
    "target_devices": [
      "temperature_sensor",
      "occupancy_sensor",
      "door_lock",
      "smoke_co_alarm",
      "water_leak_detector"
    ],
    "target_question": "判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。"
  },
  "focus_rooms": [
    "living_room",
    "kitchen",
    "master_bedroom",
    "kids_room",
    "entrance"
  ],
  "focus_devices": [
    "temperature_sensor",
    "occupancy_sensor",
    "door_lock",
    "smoke_co_alarm",
    "water_leak_detector"
  ],
  "focus_chunk_ids": [
    "C00",
    "C07",
    "C11",
    "C18"
  ],
  "suspected_patterns": [
    "Consistent indoor temperatures (22-25°C) across all monitored rooms",
    "Predominantly unoccupied state with isolated occupancy events",
    "Zero lock state changes or access attempts",
    "High telemetry frequency but no explicit fault, alarm, or safety-device failure events in previews"
  ],
  "why_these_chunks": [
    "C00 establishes baseline overnight telemetry and environmental stability",
    "C07 captures the only notable occupancy transition (kids_room) for human-activity context",
    "C11 and C18 cover afternoon and late-night periods to verify consistency and rule out transient hazards",
    "Together they span the full 24-hour cycle, satisfying composite-safety requirements to assess overall home safety without prematurely narrowing to a single device"
  ],
  "latent_task_profile": "composite-safety",
  "query_intent_profile": "composite-safety"
}

## Investigator

{
  "normal_hypotheses": [
    {
      "id": "N1",
      "descript


灶具开着 + 厨房无人 + 老人在其他房间
跟 FG-01 类似但在老人场景下更危险（认知衰退风险更高）

The logs indicate a normal cooking routine with continuous supervision and stable environmental conditions; the suspected unattended cooking risk is unsubstantiated.

Explanation: The investigator's 'unattended cooking' hypothesis incorrectly interprets Matter's event-driven reporting protocol as a telemetry gap or safety blind spot. A persistent 'on' state naturally generates no logs until a state transition occurs, making the absence of updates between 12:14 and 17:25 protocol-normal rather than a monitoring failure.

Explanation: Cross-referencing with occupancy and temperature sensors shows continuous kitchen presence (raw=1) throughout the period, with only a brief, recovered dip at 12:04. Kitchen temperature remains stable and slightly decreases (~25.3°C to ~23.7°C), ruling out thermal escalation or fire risk.

Explanation: The sequence aligns perfectly with a normal, supervised cooking routine. Without evidence of hazardous conditions, device faults, or actual abandonment, the anomaly hypothesis is refuted in favor of the normal routine explanation.

Explanation: Although the final 'off' transition is pending in the unprovided C16 chunk, the current evidence strongly supports a safe status, warranting a `none` classification with medium confidence pending the final state confirmation.

Matter protocol semantics: stable boolean states do not produce continuous logs.

Persistent kitchen_occupancy = occupied (raw=1) from 11:54 to 17:25, indicating continuous supervision.

Stable kitchen temperature (~25.3°C to ~23.7°C) with no upward trend, contradicting fire or hazardous overheating.

Monitor the final cook surface 'off' state transition in the upcoming C16 chunk to confirm routine completion.

No immediate safety intervention required; maintain standard monitoring.

kitchen entrance bedroom living_room bathroom

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险

Door contact sensor activity for security context

判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险

Normal prolonged cooking routine with stable environmental conditions and standard Matter telemetry behavior.

Kitchen occupancy remains consistently occupied (raw=1) from 11:12 through 17:25, indicating continuous human presence and supervision.

Kitchen temperature remains stable and slightly decreases from ~25.35°C to ~23.70°C, showing no thermal escalation or hazardous heat buildup.

The cessation of cook surface state updates after 12:14 aligns with Matter's event-driven reporting protocol, where unchanged states are not repeatedly transmitted unless a threshold or state change occurs.

Relies on the assumption that the resident remained in the kitchen continuously, despite a brief 3-minute occupancy dip at 12:04.

Does not account for potential intermittent connectivity or device-side reporting delays that could mask a state change.

Unattended cooking risk compounded by a telemetry monitoring gap preventing remote state verification.

Cook surface state is confirmed 'on' at 12:14:00 with no corresponding 'off' state logged until the end of the timeline (17:25), spanning over 5 hours.

A brief kitchen occupancy dip occurs at 12:04:00 (raw=0), creating a short window where the appliance could have been left active without direct supervision.

The complete absence of cook surface telemetry for ~5 hours creates a monitoring blind spot, preventing remote verification of the appliance state and representing a procedural safety risk.

Lack of thermal escalation (kitchen temp stable/decreasing) and persistent kitchen occupancy strongly contradict a hazardous fire or complete abandonment scenario.

The risk is primarily telemetry-based and procedural rather than an active emergency, as the environment shows no signs of distress.

Persistent kitchen_occupancy = occupied (raw=1) throughout the 12:14-17:25 window, indicating the resident was likely present.

Stable kitchen temperature readings (~25.3°C to ~23.7°C) with no upward trend, ruling out thermal escalation or fire.

Complete absence of kitchen_cook_surface state transitions between 12:14:00 and 17:25:00, creating a definitive telemetry gap.

Intermediate cook surface telemetry or heartbeat logs between 12:14 and 17:25 to confirm appliance state continuity.

Smoke and CO detector logs across the full timeline to definitively rule out combustion byproducts or gas leaks.

Cook surface configuration logs (auto-shutoff timer, safety cutoff settings) to assess built-in mitigations.

Contextual activity data (e.g., audio, other room sensors) to verify resident supervision during the 12:04 occupancy dip.

Matter event-driven boolean semantics (stable states do not generate continuous logs)

Actual cook surface off-state transition

Smoke/CO detector logs for combustion verification

Investigator misinterprets Matter's event-driven reporting as a telemetry failure or safety blind spot. A persistent 'on' state naturally produces no logs until a transition occurs. Combined with continuous kitchen occupancy, the unattended cooking risk is unsubstantiated. The analysis must correctly apply protocol semantics and verify the actual state transition in C16.

Normal extended cooking routine. The cook surface was likely used for slow cooking, simmering, or preparing a large meal. Continuous kitchen occupancy in the available logs and stable ambient temperatures indicate a controlled environment without thermal escalation. Lock operations follow a standard morning routine.

C09 and C16 show kitchen_occupancy = occupied (raw=1) before and after the activation window.

Cook surface OnOff state is ON from 11:54:00 (C09) to 17:27:00 (C16).

Kitchen ambient temperatures remain stable (~23.00–25.50 C) throughout the period, showing no signs of overheating.

Front door lock operations in C04 (06:57) show standard manual unlock followed by auto-lock, indicating normal access patterns.

Does not account for the unusually long duration of cook surface activation (~5.5 hours) without intermediate activity logs or temperature changes, which is atypical for standard cooking.

Relies on surrounding occupancy logs to infer presence during a significant telemetry gap.

Unattended cooking / Potential fire risk. The cook surface remained in the ON state for approximately 5.5 hours (11:54–17:27) with a telemetry gap preventing verification of occupant supervision. The prolonged activation without intermediate activity logs, temperature rise, or automatic shut-off indicates a dangerous context with weak mitigation, posing a fire hazard if flammable items were nearby or if the appliance malfunctioned.

C09 shows kitchen_cook_surface OnOff = on at 11:54:00.

C16 shows kitchen_cook_surface OnOff = off at 17:27:00.

Significant telemetry gap between 11:59 and 17:25 prevents confirmation of continuous supervision or activity.

No temperature escalation or smoke/fire alarm triggers recorded during the prolonged activation window.

Kitchen ambient temperature remains flat (~25 C), which may indicate the sensor is measuring room air rather than surface heat, or that heat is dissipating, but does not rule out a smoldering or unattended hazard.

Relies on a gap in telemetry to infer an unsupervised state; could be a legitimate slow-cooking process.

Lack of explicit thermal escalation, smoke detection, or safety device triggers weakens the immediate fire risk claim.

Occupancy sensors show presence in adjacent chunks, but cannot confirm the occupant was actively monitoring the cook surface during the gap.

Cook surface OnOff state transitions: ON at 11:54:00 (C09) and OFF at 17:27:00 (C16), spanning a ~5.5 hour window.

Telemetry gap between 11:59 and 17:25 preventing verification of supervision, activity, or appliance status.

Stable ambient temperatures and absence of safety alarms during prolonged activation, contrasting with the high-risk duration of the cook surface being ON.

Intermediate telemetry logs between 11:59 and 17:25 for kitchen occupancy, cook surface status, and ambient temperature to verify continuous supervision.

Data from smoke/CO detectors or localized heat sensors placed near the cook surface to rule out thermal escalation or smoldering.

Smart home automation logs or user activity records to confirm intentional prolonged use (e.g., scheduled timers, slow cooker integration, or routine meal prep).

Intermediate telemetry for cook surface and occupancy between 11:59 and 17:25

Smoke/CO detector logs across the full timeline

Cook surface timer or auto-shutoff configuration logs

The investigator correctly identifies the prolonged cook surface activation and the critical telemetry gap. The analysis appropriately weighs the unattended cooking hypothesis against normal slow-cooking routines, noting the absence of thermal escalation or safety alarms. However, the conclusion currently rests heavily on the missing intermediate data. Per protocol, a fire risk conclusion based mainly on a telemetry gap without hazardous escalation carries a high false-alarm risk. Requesting chunks C10-C15 is essential to verify continuous supervision, appliance status, and any mitigating events. Once retrieved, the investigation can confirm or dismiss the risk.

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Layout
Layout: 独居老人 (Elderly Living Alone)
- bathroom: 卫生间漏水传感器<water_leak_detector>, 卫生间灯<onoff_light>, 卫生间运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- bedroom: 卧室温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 卧室灯<dimmable_light>, 卧室窗帘<window_covering>, 卧室窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 卧室运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>, 床头灯<onoff_light>
- entrance: 入户门传感器<contact_sensor>, 入户门锁<door_lock>, 玄关灯<onoff_light>, 玄关运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- kitchen: 厨房温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 厨房漏水传感器<water_leak_detector>, 厨房灯<onoff_light>, 厨房灶具<cook_surface>, 厨房烟雾报警器<smoke_co_alarm>, 厨房运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>
- living_room: 客厅温度传感器<temperature_sensor>, 客厅灯<dimmable_light>, 客厅烟雾报警器<smoke_co_alarm>, 客厅空调<air_conditioner>, 客厅窗帘<window_covering>, 客厅窗户传感器<contact_sensor>, 客厅运动传感器<occupancy_sensor>

## Deterministic Signals
{
  "room_activity": {
    "living_room": 498,
    "bedroom": 530,
    "kitchen": 536,
    "bathroom": 63,
    "entrance": 231
  },
  "attribute_frequency": {
    "Occupancy": 947,
    "MeasuredValue": 871,
    "OnOff": 23,
    "CurrentPositionLiftPercent100ths": 4,
    "LockState": 4,
    "StateValue": 4,
    "CurrentLevel": 1
  },
  "lock_state_flips": 4,
  "occupancy_events": 947,
  "temperature_patterns": [],
  "value_format_hints": {
    "temperature": "MeasuredValue is shown as Celsius with the raw integer preserved in parentheses.",
    "occupancy": "0=unoccupied, 1=occupied",
    "lock_state": "enumerated lock state rendered as label + raw code"
  }
}

## Chunk Index
[
  {
    "chunk_id": "C00",
    "start_ts": "2026-06-12T00:00:00",
    "end_ts": "2026-06-12T01:35:00",
    "event_count": 80,
    "rooms": {
      "living_room": 24,
      "bedroom": 24,
      "kitchen": 24,
      "bathroom": 4,
      "e

## Query
以下是家庭设备的综合状态报告。请综合分析所有信息，判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险。

## Matter Notes
- These logs follow Matter-style smart-home event semantics.
- TemperatureMeasurement.MeasuredValue is represented in centi-degrees Celsius in this benchmark: 2466 means 24.66 C, not 2466 C.
- BooleanState and other protocol booleans should be interpreted using transitions and surrounding events, not naive natural-language assumptions from a single isolated value.
- OccupancySensing.Occupancy uses 0=unoccupied and 1=occupied.
- DoorLock.LockState is an enumerated state; formatted logs may show both the label and the raw code.
- A device-fault conclusion requires direct fault evidence such as stuck values, repeated non-recovery, explicit alarm/fault events, or impossible state transitions. Scaled temperature values alone are not enough.

## Triage
{
  "primary_task_profile": "composite-safety",
  "secondary_task_profile": "none",
  "query_anchor": {
    "target_rooms": [
      "kitchen",
      "entrance",
      "bedroom",
      "living_room",
      "bathroom"
    ],
    "target_devices": [
      "cook_surface",
      "door_lock",
      "contact_sensor",
      "occupancy_sensor",
      "temperature_sensor"
    ],
    "target_question": "判断家庭当前的安全状况，指出任何潜在风险"
  },
  "focus_rooms": [
    "kitchen",
    "entrance",
    "bedroom",
    "living_room"
  ],
  "focus_devices": [
    "cook_surface",
    "door_lock",
    "contact_sensor",
    "occupancy_sensor"
  ],
  "focus_chunk_ids": [
    "C09",
    "C16",
    "C06",
    "C04"
  ],
  "suspected_patterns": [
    "Prolonged cook surface activation (~6 hours) indicating potential unattended cooking/fire risk",
    "Normal morning occupancy transition establishing baseline routine",
    "Door contact sensor activity for security context"
  ],
  "why_these_chunks": [
    "C09 captures the cook surface turning on and initial kitchen occupancy, marking the start of the potential hazard",
    "C16 captures the cook surface turning off after a prolonged period, highlighting the unattended cooking risk and lack of immediate intervention",
    "C06 shows door contact and morning entry activity to assess security and access patterns",
    "C04 shows the start of daily occupancy patterns to establish a baseline routine for the elderly resident"
  ],
  "latent_task_profile": "composite-safety",
  "query_intent_profile": "composite-safety"
}

## Investigator

{
  "normal_hypotheses": [
    {
      "id": "N1",
      "description": "Normal prolonged cooking r